Brief Summary
This phase III trial compares 6 months of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapy to 12 months of HER2-targeted therapy for the treatment of HER2-positive (+) breast cancer in patients that had a pathologic complete response (pCR) after preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy with trastuzumab. Trastuzumab and pertuzumab are monoclonal antibodies and forms of targeted therapy that attach to a receptor protein called HER2. HER2 is found on some cancer cells. When trastuzumab or pertuzumab attach to HER2, the signals that tell the cells to grow are blocked and the tumor cell may be marked for destruction by the body’s immune system. Giving 6 months of HER2-targeted therapy may work better than giving 12 months for the treatment of HER2+ breast cancer in patients that had a pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab.
Protocol Interventions
Biological: Trastuzumab (Herceptin), Biological: Pertuzumab, Procedure: Echocardiography, Procedure: Multigated Acquisition Scan, Procedure: Mammography, Procedure: Ultrasound, Procedure: Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Procedure: Biospecimen Collection, Other: Questionnaire Administration
Brief Summary
This is a randomized, open-label study comparing the efficacy and safety of adjuvant sacituzumab tirumotecan (MK-2870) in combination with pembrolizumab compared to treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in participants with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who received neoadjuvant therapy and did not achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) at surgery. The primary objective is to compare sacituzumab tirumotecan plus pembrolizumab to TPC (pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab plus capecitabine) with respect to invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) per investigator assessment. It is hypothesized that sacituzumab tirumotecan plus pembrolizumab is superior to TPC with respect to iDFS per investigator assessment.
Protocol Interventions
Biological: Pembrolizumab, Drug: Capecitabine
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to find out if the experimental product, sacituzumab govitecan-hziy (SG) in combination with pembrolizumab given after surgery, is effective and safe compared to the treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) which includes either pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab plus capecitabine in participants with triple negative breast cancer that still remains after surgery and pre-surgical treatment.
Protocol Interventions
Drug: Pembrolizumab, Drug: Capecitabine
Brief Summary
The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of elacestrant versus standard endocrine therapy in participants with node-positive, Estrogen Receptor-positive (ER+), Human Epidermal Growth Factor-2 negative (HER2-) early breast cancer with high risk of recurrence.
Protocol Interventions
Drug: Anastrozole, Drug: Letrozole, Drug: Exemestane, Drug: Tamoxifen
Brief Summary
In breast cancer patients with nodal involvement, numerous studies have demonstrated that adjuvant radiation therapy reduces the risk of local recurrence, regional recurrence, and distant metastases, in addition to improving survival. The dose and fractionation for adjuvant breast radiation therapy has evolved over time, as novel schedules have been compared to the current standard of care. Hypofractionated radiation therapy (266 cGy per fraction x 15-16 fractions over 3 weeks) has been shown to result in equivalent oncologic outcomes, as well as equivalent acute and late toxicity, when compared to standard fractionation (200 cGy per fraction x 25 fractions over 5 weeks). Subsequently, hypofractionated breast radiation has become the current standard of care.
More recently, ultra-hypofractionated breast radiation (520 cGy per fraction x 5 fractions over 1 week) was shown in a randomized trial to be non-inferior to hypofractionated radiation when treating the breast after lumpectomy. However, the efficacy and toxicity of using ultra-hypofractionated radiation therapy when also treating the regional nodes has not been reported. This is important, as there is greater radiation exposure to several normal tissues, such as the arm/shoulder, brachial plexus, normal lymphatics, heart, and lung, when treating the regional nodes.
In this randomized study, the investigators aim to compare the tolerability and efficacy of ultra-hypofractionated breast/chest wall and regional nodal radiation (SWIFT RT) against hypofractionated radiation (RT). The investigators will evaluate acute and late toxicity, oncologic outcomes (including local recurrence, regional recurrence, distant metastasis, and overall survival), cosmesis, and patient-reported quality of life. The investigators will collect blood samples for correlative studies of biomarkers of fibrosis and cardiac toxicity.
Protocol Interventions
Radiation: Ultra-hypofractionated breast/chest wall and regional nodal radiation
Brief Summary
This is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multi-center, Phase 3 study of GLSI-100 immunotherapy in HLA-A*02 positive and HER2/neu positive subjects who are at high risk for disease recurrence and have completed both neoadjuvant and postoperative adjuvant standard of care therapy. Treatment consists of 6 intradermal injections, Primary Immunization Series (PIS), over the first 6 months of treatment and 5 booster intradermal injections spaced 6 months apart. A third open-label arm will explore GLSI-100 immunotherapy in non-HLA-A*02 positive and HER2/neu positive subjects.
Protocol Interventions
Biological: GLSI-100
Brief Summary
This Phase III Trial will determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) added to ovarian function suppression (OFS) plus endocrine therapy (ET) is superior to OFS plus ET in improving invasive breast cancer-free survival (IBCFS) among premenopausal, early- stage breast cancer (EBC) patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative tumors and 21-gene recurrence score (RS) between 16-25 (for pN0 patients) and 0-25 (for pN1 patients).
Protocol Interventions
Drug: Ovarian Function Suppression + Aromatase Inhibitor, Drug: Adjuvant Chemotherapy + Ovarian Function Suppression
Brief Summary
This phase III trial compares the effect of continuation of treatment with pembrolizumab (usual approach) to observation only at preventing cancer from coming back in patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who achieved a pathologic complete response after preoperative chemotherapy in combination with pembrolizumab. The usual approach for patients with early-stage TNBC who receive preoperative chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab is to continue to receive pembrolizumab for up to 27 weeks after surgery. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as pembrolizumab, may help the body’s immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. This trial may help researchers determine if observation is as good as receiving pembrolizumab for 27 weeks after surgery in triple-negative breast cancer patients who achieved a pathologic complete response after preoperative treatment with chemotherapy and pembrolizumab.
Protocol Interventions
Other: Patient Observation, Procedure: Biopsy, Procedure: Biospecimen Collection, Other: Questionnaire Administration, Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment
Brief Summary
This study aims to utilize a novel biomarker-driven approach to guide neoadjuvant treatment selection. It is the hypothesis that this will improve clinical response for postmenopausal women with clinical stage II/III ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer and identify those who may not require neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with a primary focus on outcomes in Black patients.
Protocol Interventions
Device: VENTANA MIB-1 Ki67 assay, Device: Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score, Device: PAM50-based Prosigna breast cancer gene signature assay, Drug: Combination anthracycline and/or taxane based treatment
