Brief Summary
This clinical trial will study ruxolitinib-based treatment of acute graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) that developed following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant. Acute GVHD occurs when donor cells attack the healthy tissue of the body. The most common symptoms are skin rash, jaundice, nausea, vomiting, and/or diarrhea. The standard treatment for GVHD is high dose steroids such as prednisone or methylprednisolone, which suppresses the donor cells, but sometimes there can be either no response or the response does not last. In these cases, the GVHD can become dangerous or even life threatening. High dose steroid treatment can also cause serious complications. Researchers have developed a system, called the Minnesota risk system, to help predict how well the GVHD will respond to steroids based on the symptoms present at the time of diagnosis. The Minnesota risk system classifies patients with newly diagnosed acute GVHD into two groups with highly different responses to standard steroid treatment and long-term outcomes. This protocol maximizes efficiency because all patients with grade II-IV GVHD are eligible for screening and treatment is assigned according to patient risk. Patients with lower risk GVHD, Minnesota standard risk, have high response rates to steroid treatment. In this trial the researchers will test whether ruxolitinib alone is as effective (non-inferior) as steroid-free therapy and safe. Patients will be randomized to two different doses of ruxolitinib to identify the dose which maximizes efficacy while minimizing toxicities such as hematologic and infectious toxicities. Patients with higher risk GVHD, Minnesota high risk, have unacceptable outcomes with systemic corticosteroid treatment alone and the researchers will test whether adding ruxolitinib, a proven effective second line GVHD treatment, can improve outcomes when added to systemic corticosteroids as first line treatment.
Protocol Interventions
Drug: Ruxolitinib, Drug: Methylprednisolone
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess how bleximenib and Venetoclax (VEN)+ Azacitidine (AZA) works as compared to placebo and VEN+AZA alone for the treatment of participants with newly diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) with a mutation in the NPM1 or KMT2A gene.
Protocol Interventions
Drug: Venetoclax (VEN), Drug: Azacitidine (AZA), Drug: Placebo
Brief Summary
This phase 2 study aims to confirm the efficacy seen in the prior phase 1 trial, and further contribute to this effort through the collection of leukemia cells pre- and post- in vivo IFN-γ therapy. As in the previously conducted phase 1 trial, this trial will test whether leukemia blasts were responsive to IFN-γ in vitro and in vivo, with single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) conducted to understand the transcriptomic changes induced by IFN-γ in leukemia cell subsets, including those with stem cell characteristics.
Protocol Interventions
Drug: Interferon gamma-1b, Biological: Donor Leukocyte Infusion (DLI)
Brief Summary
Multiple myeloma is a cancer of the plasma cells in the bone marrow.
The main aim of this study is to learn how well the Immune Globulin Infusion (human), 10 percentage (%) (IGI, 10%) can help prevent infections in participants with multiple myeloma receiving B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) x cluster of differentiation 3 (CD3) directed bispecific antibody therapy.
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups:
1. Primary infection prevention group: They will receive IGI, 10% for 12 months.
2. Secondary infection prevention group: They will only receive IGI, 10% if they develop a serious infection during the 12 months study period.
During the study, participants will visit their study clinic 15 times (for 4-week dosing interval) or 19 times (for 3-week dosing interval) and their total participation duration will be up to 14 months (including screening period approximately 8 weeks).
Protocol Interventions
Biological: IGI, 10%
Brief Summary
Study CBX-250-001 is a Phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation study of CBX-250 in participants with relapsed/refractory AML, HR-MDS, CMML, and CML. Participants aged ≥ 12 years are planned to be enrolled. CBX-250 will initially be investigated on a fixed step-up dosing schedule. CBX-250 will be administered subcutaneously in 28-day cycles, with the first study drug dose administered on Cycle 1, Day 1. Cycle 1 will consist of a priming phase over 7 days, and a target phase over 28 days. Participants will continue CBX-250 until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. All subsequent treatment cycles will be 28 days.
Protocol Interventions
Drug: CBX-250
Brief Summary
This is a phase Ib study evaluating PMD-026, an oral inhibitor of ribosomal protein S6 kinase A1 (RSK1), in participants with myelofibrosis (MF).The dose escalation portion utilizes a standard 3+3 design to evaluate two dose levels with an additional dose de-escalation portion to identify the recommended phase II dose (RP2D); subsequently, an additional 6 patients will be enrolled in the dose expansion portion evaluating the efficacy of PMD-026.
Protocol Interventions
Drug: PMD-026
Brief Summary
This phase III trial compares the effect of high dose chemotherapy and the patients’ own (autologous) stem cells to observation only in patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma who achieved a complete response after initial chemotherapy. Usual treatment after a complete response may include observation or high dose chemotherapy followed by an autologous stem cell transplant, however, it is not known if a transplant if beneficial. Giving chemotherapy before a stem cell transplant helps kill cancer cells in the body and helps make room in the patient’s bone marrow for new blood-forming cells (stem cells) to grow. Stem cells removed prior to treatment are then returned to the patient to replace the blood forming cells that were destroyed by the chemotherapy. Giving high dose chemotherapy followed by an autologous stem cell transplant may be more effective compared to observation only in treating patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma who have achieved a complete response after initial chemotherapy.
Protocol Interventions
Procedure: Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Procedure: Biospecimen Collection, Procedure: Bone Marrow Aspiration, Procedure: Bone Marrow Biopsy, Procedure: Computed Tomography, Drug: High Dose Chemotherapy, Procedure: Leukapheresis, Procedure: Positron Emission Tomography, Drug: Stem Cell Mobilization Therapy
Brief Summary
The safety, tolerability, and antileukemic response of ziftomenib in combination with standard of care treatments for patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia will be examined with the following agents: FLAG-IDA, low-dose cytarabine, and gilteritinib.
Protocol Interventions
Drug: Ziftomenib, Drug: Fludarabine, Drug: Idarubicin, Drug: Cytarabine, Drug: Gilteritinib, Biological: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
Brief Summary
This is a Phase 1b open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation and dose-optimization study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and anti-tumor efficacy of eganelisib as monotherapy and in combination with cytarabine in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or r/r higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (HR-MDS).
The study consists of 2 parts:
* Part 1: Dose Escalation (DE) in both monotherapy and in combination.
* Part 2: Dose Optimization
Protocol Interventions
Drug: Eganelisib in combination with cytarabine
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess Tacrolimus/Methotrexate/Ruxolitinib versus Post-Transplant Cyclophosphamide/Tacrolimus/Mycophenolate Mofetil in Non-Myeloablative/Reduced Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation
Protocol Interventions
Drug: Tacrolimus (Tac), Drug: Cyclophosphamide, Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)
